If the answers are not, IGN are well in their right to not recommend a game that they personally experience as broken.
#Prey review ign Patch#
This means that statistically speaking, their PCs are good enough for the job.Ĭan you guarantee with a straight face that some other people out there do not have the same PC as the reviewer? Can you guarantee that it is a PC related issue, not a general save corruption bug? Can you guarantee that the patch fixes it? Can you guarantee that people will update? When the last time you heard of a massive reviewer encountering game breaking bugs? It is very rare, even in the case where a lot of normal people are experiencing bugs. Completely a different thing for a big reviewer to experience a game breaking bug. It is one thing for some random unverifiable dude on the Internet to experience issues. If there is any hint that the game is broken, they must report on it. Reviews are not apologists for developers. Typhon Hunter is a lethal game of hide-and-seek between a single survivor (Morgan Yu) and five other players who stalk, hunt, and hide in plain sight as shape-shifting Mimic aliens.
#Prey review ign movie#
IGNs own review of The Predator says the movie splinters apart in the haphazard and shoddy-looking last half-hour, largely derailing what began as a promising entry in the wildly inconsistent franchise. I am saying that all you need is one solitary case for a corruption save issue to raise the alarms. Mooncrash includes Prey: Typhon Hunter, an online multiplayer update. According to previous reports, Prey won’t be connected to the recent 2018 reboot, The Predator, which was received poorly by critics. He could have actually finished the game, as he was enjoying it, and rated it accordingly - then mention that on PC X/Y he got this bug and leave a warning. They don't even give out the specs of the PC they were playing the game at? Or drivers? What kind of professionalism is this? The issue should have been mentioned on the technical aspects of the game, not the core game itself.
So you are telling me that they do not have another gaming PC they could have tested the game on, so they could actually finish the game? Instead we got this half-assed 2:49 MINUTE review giving the game a 4 for something that has already been fixed. They can give it a 4 due to this bug only, ignoring any other considerations. If a game is so unlucky to cause issues due to bugs in the hands of a reviewer, that reviewer is morally obligated to call it out and asses what impact it can have.Ĭase closed. "But wait, it only corrupted saves for them. If the game does not function, its quality is not important. Originally posted by Zyrconia:So wait: the game crashed multiple times and there were multiple save corruption bugs and you want them to recommend the game to other people.
0 kommentar(er)
